🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a privilege that authorities grant or deny at their discretion. This constitutes the implication of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would determine when and where demonstrations can occur, with possible imprisonment for those who defy these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous governments had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement extensive additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and undue limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these progressive assaults on liberty have effectively eliminated the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Atrocity to Justify Crackdown

The most recent restrictive measures are being justified by citing last week's terrible anti-Jewish assault on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be protected. However, using this horrific incident as a justification to suppress dissent is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"If you can't draw the line at genocide, you probably cannot draw the line at democratic principles," commented a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Protest

Reflect on Britain's rich history of protest and direct action against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as extremists in their time, even while they were fighting for the rights of minorities.

Present Situation

In the current complex situation, here's what's truly occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is committing acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its warfare have prompted the global justice body to release legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

International popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens believe Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would support a total prohibition on weapons exports to the state, and approve the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially failed the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a despicable antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this attempt. Ministers have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish heritage with the actions of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a situation where police authorities can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's actions should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have declared that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "complicit" in alleged abuse experienced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from 24 months of ongoing violence that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and media outlets have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of discrimination in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a concerning boundary by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused activist collective. Thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for carrying placards against mass killing and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those arrested are pensioners; among them a former clergyman and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "linked with" other nations, while the sitting leader described such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to suppress dissent. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may eventually regret how casually we allowed them to be eroded.